Fintech translation
for product and interface
This is the copy people read while moving their money, and it has no tolerance for ambiguity. A button that could mean two things does not produce a support ticket โ it produces an abandoned transfer and a user who does not come back.
- Onboarding and verification screens
- Payment and transfer flows
- Microcopy, errors and notifications
- API docs and help centres
- Confidential โ NDA on request
Get your quote
Send a string export, a staging link or a few screens, and we will reply with a fixed price.
Received!
Our team will get back to you very shortly.
- One term, the same word everywhere
- Get a quote the same day
- Confidential โ NDA on request
What makes this copy hard
The words are load-bearing
"Pending", "cleared", "available balance", "held" each name one specific state of someoneโs money. A near-synonym that reads more smoothly in the target language quietly changes what the user believes.
A lot of it is not free text
Disclosure lines, consent screens and confirmation text are often fixed by your own compliance review. The craft is finding natural phrasing inside a meaning that is already settled.
It has to match across surfaces
The name of a thing in the app is its name in the confirmation email, on the statement and in the help article. Three names for one thing reads as a fault, and the user calls you.
Errors are read most carefully
The screens people actually study are the ones telling them something went wrong. An error has to say what happened and what to do next, without alarming a user whose money is fine.
Fintech content we translate
If what you have is not on this list, send it anyway โ the answer is almost always yes.
Wording that cannot drift
In a payment flow the words are load-bearing. "Pending", "cleared", "available balance", "held" each name a specific state of someoneโs money, and the near-synonym that reads more naturally in the target language quietly tells the user something that is not true. So we settle those words before we translate anything: a short list, agreed with you, and the rest of the copy is written around it.
A good part of fintech copy is not free text at all. Disclosure lines, consent screens and confirmation text are frequently prescribed โ reviewed by your compliance team and not available to be improved for style. That constraint is the work. The job is to find phrasing that sounds like a person wrote it while the meaning stays exactly where it was, and to tell you when the target language genuinely cannot carry it, instead of stretching a sentence until it does.
Then it has to hold everywhere the user meets it, from the app to the help centre. That is what the termbase is for: one agreed word per concept, applied to every surface and every language, including copy we translated a year ago. A second linguist revises every string against it before delivery, and you get the term list itself, so your writers and your reviewers are working from the same page as we are.
Happy to be of service,
Gabriel Brunner, Founder
How a fintech project runs
- 1
Send the strings and the context
A string export, a staging link, screenshots, the designs โ whatever exists. Context is what stops a translator guessing which "balance" you mean.
- 2
Receive your quote
A fixed price for the scope, with repeated strings already discounted. Tell us the release date and we confirm whether we can meet it before you commit.
- 3
We agree the terms first
The words that carry meaning, plus anything your compliance team has fixed, are settled and approved before translation starts. Everything else follows from that list.
- 4
Translated, revised, consistent
A second linguist checks every string against the agreed terms, so the app, the email, the statement and the help article all say the same word.
